Is This Disability Justice? Hating and Wanting Hyflex

Authors

  • Amy Vidali Full Teaching Professor University of California, Santa Cruz

Keywords:

Hyflex; Hybrid; Disability Justice; Choice; Modality; Access

Abstract

This essay examines whether hyflex modalities--loosely defined as being in-person and online/on-Zoom simultaneously--further the goals of disability justice. To do this, I examine a selection of post-pandemic hyflex scholarship, and based on this review, I argue that hyflex: (1) requires curricular and institutional support that is almost always lacking; (2) is falsely premised on “access” and “choice” for students (and not faculty); (3) is deeply stained by the pandemic, and we have not dealt with hyflex’s trauma relations; (4) is/was never about disability justice, and while we may (want to) repurpose it as such, doing so requires us to recognize its neoliberal emphases. Despite these damning critiques, I conclude by questioning my own proclivity for black-and-white thinking and suggest that we are at a precarious impasse with hyflex.

Author Biography

Amy Vidali, Full Teaching Professor University of California, Santa Cruz

Full Teaching Professor

University of California, Santa Cruz

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Vidali, A. (2026). Is This Disability Justice? Hating and Wanting Hyflex. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 15(1), 50–76. Retrieved from https://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/1338

Issue

Section

Articles