More than Sport: Representations of Ability and Gender by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) of the 2004 Summer Paralympic Games

  • Nancy Quinn University of Toronto
  • Karen Yoshida Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto
Keywords: Key Words, ability/disability, sport, media, representation, gender


Purpose: To examine the CBC’s television coverage of two highlighted Canadian Paralympic athletes who participated at the 2004 Summer Paralympic Games held in Athens, Greece. This analysis focuses on representations of ability and gender and to consider the repercussions of these representations for Paralympians, people living with physical difference, and spectators. Methods: Informed by disability studies theory and Garland-Thomson’s (2000) work, qualitative research methods were used to analyze segments of CBC’s television coverage of two Canadian Paralympians, one male and one female, for dominant and recurring themes. Results: Multiple positive representations of athletes were presented in the data. The dominant theme was the athletic.  Though a positive alternative to negative stereotypes of ability this representation is used solely for the female athlete in this case study. The analysis of the male athlete revealed a more nuanced, complex representation.  Within this analysis, the asexuality of female athletes with a physical difference is perpetuated and male hegemony within sport is reinforced.   Conclusions: Media has a powerful role in the construction of social perceptions of people with physical difference. Based on this analysis, the CBC coverage promoted a more fully human portrayal of the highlighted male Paralympian. However its representation of the female athlete continued to reinforce ableist assumptions regarding ability and the asexuality of women with a disability. Sport journalism is a powerful medium that constructs representations of people with physical difference, however critical analyses of these representations are necessary to reinforce those that are positive and realistic representations of people with physical difference.  

Author Biographies

Nancy Quinn, University of Toronto
University of Toronto
Karen Yoshida, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto

BScPT, MSc, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto 


Biklen, D. (1985). Framed: Print journalism treatment of disability issues. Social Policy, 6, 79-85.
Buysse, J.M. (2010). Framing gender and disability: A cross cultural analysis of Photographs from the 2008 Paralympic Games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 308-321.
Davis, L.R. (1993). Critical analysis of the popular media and the concept of ideal subject position: Sports Illustrated as case study. Quest, 45(2), 165-181.
DePauw, K.P. (1997). The (in) visibility of disAbility: Cultural contexts and “Sporting Bodies.” Quest, 49(4), 416-430.
Darke, P. (1994). Understanding cinematic representation of disability. Social Policy, 181-197.
Duncan, M., & Aycock, A. (2005). Fitting images. Advertising, sport and disability. In Jackson S. J., & Andrews D. L. (Eds.). Sport, culture and advertising. Identities, commodities and the politics of representation. (136-153). London, UK: Routledge.
Ellis, K. (2009). Beyond the Aww Factor: Human Interest Profiles of Paralympians and the Media Navigation of Physical Difference and Social Stigma. Asian Pacific Media Educator, 19, 23-35.
Employment and Social Development Canada. (2012). Canadians in Context-People with Disabilities. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Employment and Social Development Canada.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2009). Staring: How we look. New York, USA: Oxford University Press Inc.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2000). Seeing the disabled. Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography. In P. Longmore, & L. Umansky (Eds.), The New Disability History: American Perspectives. (pp. 335-373). New York: New York University Press.
Goggin, C., & Newell, C. (2000). Crippling Paralympics: Media, Disability and Olympism. Media International Australia.97:71-84.
Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). ‘Digital disability.’ The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Hahn, H. (1996). Antidiscrimination laws and social research on disability: The minority group

perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14(1), 41-59.

Haller, B., Dorries, B., & Rahn, J. (2006). Media labeling versus the US disability community identity: a study of shifting cultural language. Disability & Society, 21(1), 61-75.
Hansen, N. & Pilo, C. (2009). The Normalcy of Doing Things Differently: Bodies, Spaces and Disability Geography. In Titchkosky, T. & Michalko, R. (2009). Rethinking Normalcy: A Disability Studies Reader. Toronto. Canadian Scholars Press.
Hardin, M., & Hardin, B. (2005). Performance or participation... pluralism or hegemony? Images of disability and gender in Sports'n Spokes magazine. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(4).
Henderson, K., & Bedini, L. (1997). Women, leisure, and “double whammies”: Empowerment and constraint. Journal of Leisurability, 24(1), 36-46.
Howe, P.D., & Jones, C. (2006). Classification of disabled athletes: (Dis)empowering the

Paralympic practice community. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23(1), 29.

Howe, P.D. (2008). From Inside the Newsrom Paralympic Media and the “Production of Elite Disability”. Http://

Hughes B., & Paterson K. (1997). The Social Model of Disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325-340.

Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. (2010). Federal Disability Report. Gatineau, QC, CA: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.
Longmore, P. K. (1987). Screening stereotypes: Images of disabled people in television and mot ion pictures. In Gartner, A, & T. Joe (Eds.) Images of the disabled, disabling images. (65-78). New York: Praeger.
Maas, K. W., & Hasbrook, C.A. (2001). Media promotion of the paradigm Citizen/Golfer: An analysis of golf magazines' representations of disability, gender, and age. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18(1), 21-36.
Misener, L., Darcy, S., Legg, D., Gilbert, K. (2013). Beyond Olympic Legacy: Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic analysis. Journal of Sport Management, 27, 329-341.
Packer, C., Gey, D., Golden,O., Jordan, A., Withers, G., Wagstaff, A., Bellwood, R., Binmore,

C., Webster, C. (2014). No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women’s sports in the

British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. Journal of Public Health,

Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 50–56

Peers, D. (2009). (Dis) empowering Paralympic histories: Absent athletes and disabling
discourses. Disability & Society, 24(5), 653-665.

Purdue, D.E.J. & Howe, .D. (2012). See the sport, not the disability: exploring the Paralympic paradox. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 2(4), 189-205.
Schell, B. L. A, & Rodriguez, S. (2001). Subverting bodies/ambivalent representations: Media analysis of Paralympian Hope Lewellen. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18(1), 127-135.
Schell, L. A., & Duncan, M. C. (1999). A content analysis of CBS's coverage of the 1996 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 27-47.
Silva, C. F., & Howe, P. D. (2012). The (in) validity of supercrip representation of Paralympian athletes. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 36(2), 174-194.
Smith, M., Wrynn, A. (2010). Women in the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games: An Analysis of Participation, Leadership and Media Opportunities. A Women’s Sports Foundation Research Report. New York.
Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. In Barnes, C., Oliver, M., & Barton, L., Eds. Disability Studies Today. (pp. 38-57). Malden, Maine, USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Thomas, N. & Smith, A. (2003). Preoccupied with Able-Bodiedness? An Analysis of the British Media Coverage of the 2000 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2(2), 166 -181.
Titchkosky, T. (2011). The Question of Access: Disability, Space and Meaning. Toronto. University of Toronto Press.
Titchkosky, T. & Michalko, R. (2009). Rethinking Normalcy: A Disability Studies Reader. Toronto. Canadian Scholars Press. P. 352.
Tynedal, J., & Wolbring, G. (2013). Paralympics and its athletes through the lens of the New York Times. Sports, 1 (1)1, 3-36.

von Sikorski, C., Schieri, T., Moller, C., Oberhauser, K. (2012). Visual news framing and effects

on recipients attitudes towards athletes with physical difference. International Journal of

Sport Communication, 3, 69-86

Wolbring, G., & Tynedal, J. (2013). Pistorius and the media: Mist, story, angles. Sports

Technology, 6(4), 177-183.

Zola, I. (1985). Depictions of disability-metaphor, message, and medium in the media: A research and political agenda. The Social Science Journal, 22(4), 5-17.