Measuring Integration of Disabled Persons: Evidence from Canada’s Time Use Databases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v6i1.335Keywords:
Integration, Daily activity, Time use, Policy evaluation, Program effectivenessAbstract
Disability is defined in terms of activity limitation. We propose using daily time use data as a macro indicator of the degree of integration of people with disabilities into the wider society. If activity patterns of disabled persons are becoming more similar to those of the general population, this indicates a reduction in activity limitation and suggests opportunity and social integration are increasing. Decreasing similarity of activity patterns would indicate a failure of policies promoting integration. Data on daily activities were drawn from Statistics Canada General Social Survey files for the cycles focusing on time use for 1992 and 2010. Canada-wide there has been a convergence of the activities of disabled and non-disabled persons of about 13 percent over the period examined. Convergence has been slightly greater for disabled women than men. The major source of convergence for disabled women has been a very large increase in paid work time as compared with disabled men. Our results are consistent with the proposition that public policy on disability is succeeding, but the attribution of activity convergence to policy and program interventions would require a great deal of additional research.
References
Brandon, P. 2007. “Time Away from Smelling the Roses: Where do Mothers Raising Children
with Disabilities Find the Time to Work?” Social Science Medicine 65 (4): 667-79.
Chio, A., A. Gauthier, A. Vignola, A. Calvo, P. Ghiglione, E. Cavallo, A.A. Terreni, and R.
Mutani. 2006. “Caregiver Time Use in ALS.” Neurology 67 (5): 902-4.
Crowe, T. K., and S. I. Florez. 2006. “Time Use of Mothers with School-Age Children: A
Continuing Impact of a Child’s Disability.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy 60 (2): 194-203.
Eklund, M., C. Leufstadius, and U. Bejerholm. 2009. “Time Use Among People with Psychiatric
Disabilities: Implications for Practice.” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 32 (3): 177-91.
Employment and Skills Development Canada. 2010. Federal Disability Report. Ottawa.
Employment and Skills Development Canada. 2011. Federal Disability Report: Seniors with
Disabilities in Canada. Ottawa.
Grondin, C. 2016. A New Survey Measure of Disability: the Disability Screening Questions
(DSQ). Statistics Canada catalogue 89-654-x2016003.
Harvey, A. 1982. Studies in Broadcasting 18, Role and Context: Shapers of Behaviour. Nippon
Hoso Kyokai, Tokyo.
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. 2012. Federal Disability Reference Guide.
Ottawa.
Joiner, I. 2006. “Obscuring Disability: The Impact of a Universalism/Minority Group Dichotomy
on Assessing Equality.” In Disability and Social Policy in Canada, edited by M. A. McColl and L. Jongbloed. Toronto: Captus.
Kitterod, R. H., and T. H. Lyngstad. (2004). “Diary Versus Questionnaire Information on Time
Spend on Housework – The Case of Norway.” International Journal of Time Use Research 2: 13-32.
Law, M. 2002. “Participation in the Occupations of Everyday Life.” American Journal of
Occupational Therapy 56 (6): 640-9.
Lomax, C. L., R. G. Brown, and R. J. Howard. 2004. “Measuring Disability in Patients with
Neurodegenerative Disease using the 'Yesterday Interview.'” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 19 (11): 1058-64.
McColl, M. A., and R. Bond. 2013. “A Scoping Review of Disability Policy in Canada.”
McColl, M. A., and L. Jongbloed. 2006. Disability & Social Policy in Canada (2nd ed.) Toronto:
Captus Press.
McColl, M. A., and R. Stevenson. 2008. A Scoping Review of Disability Policy in Canada:
Effects on Community Integration for People with Spinal Cord Injuries. Report to the Spinal Cord Injury Solutions Network, http://69.89.31.83/~disabio5/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/A-Scoping-Review-of-Disability-Policy-In-Canada.pdf
McColl, M. A., C. Wilson, P. MacKinnon, and F. Zhang. 2014. “How Does Disability Affect
Time Use?” poster presented at the International Association for Time Use Research, 36th annual conference, Turku Finland, July 30 – August 2.
Nierobisz, A. C., and C. Theroux. 2008. Disability Complaints Submitted to the Canadian
Human Rights Commission: An Analysis of Systemic Barriers Reported by Complainants. Canadian Human Right Commission Report.
Nordberg, G., A. Wimo, L. Jonsson, I. Kareholt, B. M. Sjolund, M. Lagergren, E. von Strauss.
“Time Use and Costs of Institutionalised Elderly Persons With or Without Dementia: Results from the Nordanstig Cohort in the Kungsholmen Project--A Population Based Study in Sweden.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22 (7): 639-48.
Parliament of Canada. 1981. Obstacles: Report of the Special Committee on the Disabled and the
Handicapped. First session, thirty-second parliament, 1980-81 (Cat. No. XC 2-321/5-O3E).
Pentland, W., A. S. Harvey, T. Smith, and J. Walker. 1999a. “The Impact of Spinal Cord Injury
on Men’s Time Use.” Spinal Cord 37: 786-792.
Pentland, W, A. S. Harvey, M. P. Lawton, and M. A. McColl. eds. 1999b. Time Use Research in
the Social Sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Statistics Canada. 2011. General Social Survey 2010 - Overview of Time Use of Canadians.
Catalogue 89-647.
Statistics Canada. 2013. Disability in Canada: Initial Findings from the Canadian Survey on
Disability. Catalogue 89-654x, #2.
Stewart, J. 2006. “Assessing Alternative Dissimilarity Indexes for Comparing Activity Profiles.”
International Journal of Time Use Research 3 (1): 48-59.
United Nations Organization (2007), Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml#top
Wilson, W. C. 1998. “Activity Pattern Analysis by Means of Sequence Alignment Methods.”
Environment and Planning 30: 1017-1038.
Wilson, C. 2008. “Activity Patterns in Space and Time: Calculating Representative Hagerstrand
Trajectories.” Transportation 35: 485-499.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
There are no article processing or submission charges for CJDS authors.
Author(s) are not required to assign their copyright in and to their article to the Canadian Journal of Disability Studies. Instead, The CJDS asks for one-time rights to print this original work.
All articles in the journal are assigned a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
Authors are asked to contact the journal Editor if they wish to post the article on any website; translate or authorize a translation of the article; copy or otherwise reproduce the article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so; copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
Contacting the Editor will simply allow us to track the use and distribution of your article. We encourage use for non-commercial, educational purposes.
Authors must provide proof of permission clearance prior to the publication of their work if they are including images or other materials that are not their own. Keep in mind that such clearance can at times be costly, and often takes time. The journal editor can often work with you to seek permissions if you need information, advice or assistance.